JellyBlue Official Website › Journal
JournalThe JellyBlue Journal: Labels, Amounts and Six Weeks
Five pieces on what this particular panel raises: an ingredient the advertising drops, the one amount that is genuinely dosed, how much a chewable can physically carry, an advert and a panel that disagree about the contents, and how to test a daily supplement without fooling yourself.
Written for somebody reading a label rather than for somebody who has already decided. Each piece runs fifteen hundred to two thousand words.
By the JellyBlue Team at Jellybllue · Medical review: Dr. Jason Greenfield, MD · Revised
The five pieces
Where these pieces come from
Every factual claim in the journal is drawn from the printed Supplement Facts panel, the seller’s own sales page, or a paper retrieved from the National Library of Medicine and checked for retraction at paper and author level. Trial amounts are read out of the abstract of the paper named rather than recalled.
Where a piece states an opinion it says so. Where the evidence does not exist, it says that too: there is no randomised human trial of horny goat weed for this use case, and no piece here pretends otherwise.
The two longer guides on the guides page cover the category and the method for reading a label in it. The journal is narrower and more specific.
Who publishes this JellyBlue website?
The standing references behind the journal's method.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Dietary Supplements · retrieved 21 September 2026 · https://www.fda.gov/food/dietary-supplements
- U.S. Federal Trade Commission · Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising (16 CFR Part 255) · retrieved 21 September 2026 · https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/use-endorsements-testimonials-advertising
- National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements · Dietary supplements for exercise and athletic performance: fact sheet for consumers · retrieved 20 September 2026 · https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/ExerciseAndAthleticPerformance-Consumer/
